Soles produced a commanding 102-58 victory over Abejas, a result built on superior shooting efficiency and remarkable ball security. The final margin of 44 points reflects a game that was rarely competitive, with Soles controlling both ends of the floor from start to finish.
The most telling statistic is Soles' shooting percentage. They converted 39 of 77 field goal attempts, a 50.6% success rate, while Abejas managed just 23 of 58, or 39.7%. That gap in efficiency explains much of the margin. Soles also attempted 19 more field goals than their opponents, a direct consequence of their dominance on the offensive glass and their ability to force turnovers. Soles grabbed 13 offensive rebounds compared to Abejas' 8, creating second-chance opportunities that Abejas could not match.
The turnover differential is even more striking. Soles committed just 2 turnovers across the entire game, an extraordinary figure that speaks to disciplined ball movement and careful decision-making. Abejas, by contrast, gave the ball away 20 times. That 18-turnover gap handed Soles a wealth of extra possessions, and they capitalised with 24 assists on their 39 made field goals, demonstrating fluid, unselfish play. Abejas managed only 9 assists, highlighting a more isolated and less cohesive offensive approach.
Three-point shooting was the one area where the teams were evenly matched. Both sides made 8 triples, though Soles needed 26 attempts to Abejas' 19. Soles' willingness to keep shooting from deep, combined with their interior efficiency, kept the Abejas defence stretched throughout. At the free-throw line, Soles went 16 of 25, while Abejas attempted just 6 free throws, making 4. That disparity reflects Soles' aggression in attacking the basket and Abejas' inability to draw contact or slow the game down.
Defensively, Soles recorded 9 steals and 4 blocks, disrupting Abejas' rhythm and feeding their transition game. Abejas managed just 1 steal and 2 blocks, offering little resistance on that end. The foul count was relatively even, with Soles committing 16 personal fouls and Abejas 20, but the free-throw attempt gap shows which team was more purposeful in driving to the rim.
Tactically, Soles' dominance stemmed from two pillars: near-perfect ball control and superior shot selection. Committing only 2 turnovers while forcing 20 is a recipe for blowout victories at any level. Their 24 assists on 39 made baskets indicate a system built on ball movement and finding the open man, while their 13 offensive rebounds ensured that even missed shots became scoring opportunities. Abejas, meanwhile, struggled to generate clean looks, relied on individual play, and paid dearly for their carelessness with the ball. The scoreline accurately reflects the gap in execution, discipline, and efficiency between the two sides.
